February 2026 Peptide Market Roundup: MIT Technology Review, RFK Jr., and the Regulatory Tug-of-War
Monthly roundup: MIT Technology Review's peptide feature, RFK Jr.'s FDA influence, Chinese import crackdown, and regulatory uncertainty.
Independent Peptide Analysis
Evidence-based analysis, vendor accountability, and honest guidance in a market flooded with marketing claims. No vendor sponsorship. No pay-for-play reviews.
Evidence-based analysis of sermorelin + testosterone therapy. What studies show about GH-testosterone synergy and body composition.
Complete timeline of FDA and ITC enforcement actions against peptide vendors from 2024-2026. Warning letters, exclusion orders, and the BPC-157 ban.
Timeline of FDA enforcement actions against peptide vendors from 2023-2026: warning letters, criminal cases, and regulatory changes.
New to peptides? Our beginner's guide covers what peptides are, how to evaluate vendors, safety considerations, and what to know first.
Analysis of independent testing data revealing alarming quality failures in grey-market peptides. What Finnrick, Janoshik, and other labs have found.
Oral BPC-157 vendors rated on transparency, third-party testing, value, and regulatory compliance. Updated quarterly.
Ratings reflect our independent analysis. Vendors cannot pay to improve their scores. See our methodology.
Evidence-rated profiles for every major peptide. What the research shows, what it doesn't, and what vendors won't tell you.
Weekly analysis of the peptide market: regulatory changes, vendor evaluations, research updates, and the news that matters. Zero vendor influence.